Research
in the area of menopause has greatly expanded in recent years. Topics
of investigation include estrogen and progestin therapy, selective estrogen receptor
modulators (SERMs), androgen supplementation, quality of life, cognitive function,
and the role of complementary and alternative medicine. Major health concerns
associated with aging, such as osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, are being
studied because of their potential relationship to decreased estrogen levels.
This article reviews recent advances and trends in hormone replacement therapy
(HRT).
PERIMENOPAUSE
Menopause
is permanent amenorrhea resulting from the cessation of follicular development
and the consequent decrease in ovarian estrogen and progesterone production. The
years immediately preceding and following the actual cessation of menstruation
have been called the perimenopause. Clinically, the several years leading up to
menopause may be more challenging to
a woman than the postmenopausal state. The erratic hormone levels may be associated
with unpredictable menses, labile mood, anxiety, insomnia, breast tenderness,
intermittent bouts of hot flushes, sleep disruption, and the exacerbation of migraine
headaches.
Women
may begin to experience hot flushes well before actual menopause when estrogen levels occasionally
drop below the threshold necessary to prevent them. Hot flushes and poor sleep
quality 1 to 2 days before and during the menses are frequently reported in the
perimenopause because estrogen levels are lowest at that time. Women may become
amenorrheic and have estrogen and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels in
the menopausal range only to return to premenopausal function with resumption
of normal menstrual cycling. Although FSH levels are useful to fertility specialists
in considering the probability of pregnancy, they are not useful in predicting
prospectively the timing of the last menstrual period.
Several
options now exist for women having difficulty during the perimenopause. In the
past, clinicians often resorted to initiating HRT before menopause in women who were highly symptomatic
with hot flushes. HRT successfully alleviates hot flushes but may not always provide
cycle control at a time in life when irregular cycles are common. Low-dose oral
contraceptives can be an excellent choice for regulating irregular or heavy bleeding
unrelated to other causes. Hot flushes and mood lability frequently improve as
well. Awareness of the safety of low-dose oral contraceptives in this age group
has gradually increased. Reports of the low incidence of cardiovascular events
in nonsmoking women aged more than 35 years who take oral contraceptives have
challenged the adage that these agents should not be used in the older woman.
Such women should be normotensive; should be nonsmokers; and have a negative history
for venous thromboembolic disease, hypertriglyceridemia, or liver disease.
The
additional benefit of using oral contraceptives for perimenopausal symptoms is
that the medication provides contraception. This contraceptive benefit is especially
important for women in this age group because they have the highest unplanned
pregnancy rate among women aged more than 20 years. For perimenopausal women using
oral contraceptives, the question becomes when to discontinue their use because
withdrawal bleeding can occur indefinitely and obscure the occurrence of menopause.
Determining when a patient becomes menopausal while taking oral contraceptives
can be a challenge. The woman can be instructed to call her physician when she
is routinely experiencing hot flushes the week she is taking the placebo pills
in the package. In the absence of hot flushes, a FSH level can be obtained at
the end of the week of placebo pills starting at age 50 to 51 years. A level greater
than 30 IU/mL indicates menopausal status. The higher the level, the more convincing
the result; however, neither method is foolproof. The oral contraceptive may continue
to suppress FSH even in the presence of low endogenous estradiol levels. There
is little published information documenting the validity of this approach, and
it may become expensive to measure FSH levels on several occasions; consequently,
some clinicians merely stop the oral contraceptives at an arbitrary age such as
52 or 55 years and warn patients of a very low risk of pregnancy. Such a decision
may depend on how important it is for an individual woman to avoid any possibility
of pregnancy. One year without menses is still the safest guideline despite the
fact that fecundity after age 50 years is very low. Even though the spontaneous
abortion rate over the age of 40 years approaches 50%, most women do not want
to risk the possibility of pregnancy at that age.
The
real difficulty in treating perimenopausal women stems from how little is understood
about the causes of menopause or
the changes associated with menopause.
The Study of Women's Health across the Nation (SWAN) sponsored by the National
Institutes of Health is intended to characterize the changes occurring during
the perimenopausal years so that future studies can investigate the causes and
the best approaches to therapy. As an example, it remains unclear why some women
are symptomatic (e.g., sustaining hot flushes) at this time in life, whereas others
are not.
ESTROGEN
AND EARLY MENOPAUSAL SYMPTOMS
Once
a woman is menopausal, it is appropriate to consider hormone replacement. Contraindications
include a history of an estrogen-dependent cancer, venous thromboembolic events,
uncontrolled hypertension, and active liver disease. Relative contraindications,
such as endometriosis, leiomyomata, and atypical cells on breast biopsy, merit
a discussion of the low but potential risk of exacerbating these conditions. The
woman should weigh these risks against the benefit she desires to obtain.
For
the classic menopausal symptoms of hot flushes and vaginal dryness, estrogen is
the most effective treatment. In fact, only estrogen reliably eliminates hot flushes.
Once the mechanism behind hot flushes is understood, other effective therapies
may be developed. A wide variety of estrogen regimens are available. With various
modes of delivery and a range of doses, it is usually possible to find a regimen
that will be acceptable to the woman. The new vaginal ring provides long-lasting
delivery of a low dose of estradiol directly to the vaginal mucosa. The dose of
7 mug/day does not raise serum estradiol levels above the menopausal range. The
estradiol-containing ring improves the maturation index and symptoms of vaginal
dryness without necessitating use of a progestin but will not improve hot flushes.
Low doses of estrogen cream administered vaginally would probably serve the same
purpose, but the exact dose that would provide the benefit without stimulating
the endometrium has not been clearly established. Standard vaginal cream doses,
the equivalent of 1 g of conjugated estrogens, are no different from oral estrogen
use in that a progestin is required to protect the endometrium from the higher
systemic levels of estrogen that ensue. This dose of unopposed estrogen can cause
endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma when used long term. Estrogens are
actually absorbed better through the vaginal mucosa than through the gastrointestinal
tract.
In
addition to the creams, the estradiol-containing ring, and oral estrogens, a variety
of transdermal patches are available. The dose of estradiol in patches ranges
from 0.025 to 0.1 mg. Some patches are changed once a week and others twice a
week. Until recently, these patches have had greater appeal to the woman who had
a hysterectomy and did not have to take an oral progestogen along with transdermal
estrogen. The advent of combination patches that contain estrogen and progestogen
has increased their convenience for the woman who needs both hormones.
Continuous
dosing is another option that is attractive to some patients. For many women,
continuous dosing of the estrogen and progestogen eliminates cyclic bleeding;
however, there is a high incidence of breakthrough bleeding during the first year
on this method. Only 60% of women achieve amenorrhea by the end of the first year.
[3]
Evidence suggests that the further one is from menopause, the greater the likelihood of amenorrhea. [39]
The
continuous dosing regimen is especially beneficial for women with a history of
menstrual migraines. Eliminating the fluctuations in hormone levels can reduce
the number of migraine headaches a woman experiences. [5]
[29]
Other methods of reducing or eliminating withdrawal bleeding include reducing
the dose of estrogen or administering the progestogen less frequently than monthly.
Administering progestogen every 3 months may result in heavier, longer withdrawal
bleeding, with more breakthrough bleeding when compared with the effects of monthly
progestogen. [14]
Long-term safety data on this method are being gathered.
ANDROGENS
Decreased
libido is a common complaint at menopause. Sexual function is a complex issue wherein many factors
interact. The practitioner must rule out other causes of sexual dysfunction before
attributing the problem to declining testosterone levels. Common causes of sexual
dysfunction include relationship dissatisfaction, depression, self-image problems
associated with aging or weight gain, and use of the following medications:
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
Tricyclic antidepressants
Antihypertensives (especially alpha-methyldopa
and reserpine)
Antipsychotics
Thiazide diuretics
Fenfluramine
Metronidazole
Naproxen
Phenytoin
Digoxin
Less
is known about sexual dysfunction in women taking medications because the dysfunction
may not be so obvious as it is in men. Nonetheless, if no apparent cause of sexual
dysfunction is identified, testosterone supplementation can be considered. Women
who have undergone bilateral oophorectomy experience a 50% reduction in circulating
testosterone levels. It is not mandatory that testosterone levels be measured
before supplementing with low-dose testosterone; however, a lipid profile may
be in order because of the potential adverse effect on the lipid profile. Relative
contraindications to using testosterone include liver disease or an unfavorable
lipid profile, especially a very low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level, because
methyltestosterone could decrease the HDL further. Methyltestosterone given orally
and in combination with esterified estrogens has been found to decrease triglyceride
levels. [40]
Methyltestosterone counters the beneficial effect of estrogen on HDL and the adverse
effects of estrogen on triglycerides.
Although
the data on testosterone and sexual function in women are limited, reports suggest
a correlation between levels of free testosterone and libido, [4]
[18]
as well as improvement in sense of well-being and sexual fantasy. [37]
The wide variety of choices available for estrogen supplementation do not exist
for testosterone. The oral preparation approved by the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) is an esterified estrogen/methyltestosterone combination available in two
doses. Even the low-dose preparation probably provides more androgen than is usually
present in premenopausal women. Testosterone creams are available from compounding
pharmacies; however, few data are available regarding serum levels produced by
the different doses. Further research is needed, and new products are under investigation.
ALTERNATIVES
TO HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY
Some
women are philosophically opposed to HRT. They view menopause as a natural phenomenon and
prefer to use supplemental therapies that they consider natural. Other women turn
to these therapies because they have a medical history that precludes HRT. Still
other women try HRT but are unwilling to endure the side effects. Many alternatives
are available. The most simple approach is to live a healthy lifestyle through
nutritious food, a balanced exercise program, and elimination of unhealthy behaviors
such as smoking.
Many
individuals in the United States are going beyond a healthy lifestyle in their
search for good health. An increasing number of men and women are turning to megavitamins,
expensive vitamins, massage therapy, homeopathy, self-help groups, energy healing,
therapeutic touch, and herbal remedies. In 1990, 33% of Americans had used 1 of
16 different alternative therapies. That figure rose to 42.1% in 1997. Out-of-pocket
expenditures related to these therapies were estimated at $27 billion, an amount
thought to be equivalent to the out-of-pocket expenditures for physician services
in the same year. [10]
Although a discussion of all of these alternative
therapies as they relate to menopause
is beyond the scope of this article, a few comments about herbal supplements are
in order because of the phytoestrogens contained in many plants.
Despite
the absence of supporting data, many women view herbal supplements as a safe and
natural way to obtain an estrogenic effect. Plants contain phenolic phytoestrogens
that are similar in molecular structure to steroidal estrogens and have potencies
1/50 to 1/20,000 that of estradiol. There are many different kinds of phytoestrogens
(e.g., flavones, flavanones, flavonols, lignans, and isoflavones). Most plants
contain several types of phytoestrogens, but some plants contain only one type.
Isoflavones seem to be the most potent in terms of estrogenic activity. They are
common in legumes such as soy, lentils, chickpeas, and beans. Among the stronger
isoflavones are genistein and daidzein, both of which are found in soy.
Soy
has been the subject of numerous studies because it is consumed in large quantities
by cultures that have less cardiovascular disease and less breast, prostate, and
lung cancer than populations in which less soy is consumed. A meta-analysis of
the effects of soy on lipoproteins concluded that soy produced a significant decrease
in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglycerides. [2]
The authors have recently reported that 60 mg of isoflavone decreases total cholesterol
and the oxidation of LDL-cholesterol when consumed daily for 3 months. [34]
Soy has been reported to decrease hot flushes, [1]
but the effect is only modest. An inverse association between soy intake and breast
cancer has been suggested in observational studies in premenopausal women. [23]
[25]
These findings are consistent with the possibility that some phytoestrogens may
act similarly to SERMs.
None
of the phytoestrogens has been subjected to the large and extensive studies performed
on estrogens. The effects of phytoestrogens on the uterus and breast have not
been well documented. These products may provide a convenient alternative to HRT; however, more data
are required in this age of evidence-based medicine.
Some
herbal preparations, such as dong quai, also have been used for hot flushes with
less documentation. One controlled prospective study found no significant benefit.
[21]
Black cohosh and red clover have been marketed extensively for menopausal symptoms,
but some of these preparations may actually contain harmful substances.
LONG-TERM
HEALTH CONCERNS
Menopause
and aging are intertwined so tightly that it is often difficult to determine which
physiologic processes are predominantly related to menopause. The early sequelae of menopause, such as vasomotor symptoms and vaginal atrophy, are undoubtedly
related to a sharp decline in estrogen. Other conditions, such as osteoporosis,
are not solely under the control of estrogen but seem to be accelerated by the
reduced levels of estrogen that occur at menopause.
Osteoporosis
Substantial
evidence supports the correlation of low estrogen levels with bone loss. Although
men and women lose bone with aging, for women, there is a more rapid phase of
bone loss in the years immediately following menopause. The rapid loss that occurs
preferentially in trabecular bone can be arrested by estrogen therapy.
For
many years, it has been widely accepted that the minimum effective dose for preventing
bone loss is 0.625 mg of conjugated estrogens or the equivalent in other estrogen
products. [27]
A growing body of evidence now suggests that lower doses of estrogen may be adequate
for many women. Oral estradiol, 0.5 mg; transdermal estradiol, 0.025 mg; esterified
estrogens, 0.3 mg; and conjugated estrogens, 0.3 mg, have been found to halt bone
loss. [12]
[16]
[19]
[33]
One small study using an estradiol vaginal ring that did not raise systemic estrogen
levels above the menopausal range reported a 2.1% increase in bone mineral density
(BMD) of the forearm compared with a 2.7% loss in nonusers. [30]
It is possible that, in the very elderly, a small increase in estrogen could produce
a benefit in bone density, whereas the same small dose would not be so effective
during the rapid bone loss phase of early menopause.
Lower
doses of estrogen for bone protection have the potential benefit of reducing adverse
side effects, a feature that can be crucial to estrogen compliance. Continuation
rates for HRT are conspicuously low. It is estimated that as few as one third
of the women who begin HRT continue it long-term. [32]
A higher compliance rate was found for the 0.3-mg dose in a study comparing three
different doses of esterified estrogens. [31]
In
addition to fewer side effects with lower doses, the safety of using estrogens
may be enhanced. Conjugated estrogens and esterified estrogens have been shown
to have a greater adverse effect on triglycerides with higher oral doses. [19]
[41]
Pancreatitis resulting from hypertriglyceridemia apparently induced by oral estrogen
has been reported. [20]
In the esterified estrogen study, the 0.3-mg dose did not produce a significant
increase in triglycerides. Caution should be exercised when prescribing estrogen
for a woman who has hypertriglyceridemia. Despite the negligible effect on triglycerides,
it is unknown whether these low doses of estrogens are cardioprotective, and studies
examining this question need to be conducted.
Endometrial
safety is another issue related to dose. Many studies have confirmed a dose-dependent
occurrence of hyperplasia. Although the use of a progestogen will usually offset
the risk of cancer, a lower dose of estrogen may increase the margin of safety.
In one study, the incidence of hyperplasia after 2 years in women receiving 0.3
mg of unopposed esterified estrogens was no different from the incidence in women
taking placebo. [31]
Questions
often arise regarding (1) how long one should take estrogen for bone protection
or (2) how late one can start estrogen and still obtain benefit. Studies show
that once a woman stops HRT, bone loss accelerates, and BMD rapidly falls to the
level of a peer group who never used HRT. [13]
These observational data suggest that a woman may need to use HRT indefinitely
to maintain bone density.
Observational
data indicate that women may be able to start HRT 10 years after menopause
and achieve a BMD almost equal to women using HRT continuously since menopause. [13]
[35]
This observation is good news for the woman who has no symptoms at menopause and is not interested in using
HRT and for the woman who is concerned about breast cancer and wants to minimize
that risk by not using HRT. Both groups of women can reconsider their decision
at 60 to 65 years of age and, if they elect to begin HRT, can still obtain significant
benefit. Studies using HRT in the very elderly population indicate that improvement
in BMD can be achieved in that age group. [33]
The amounts of estrogen mentioned earlier may be beneficial, and the lower doses
may be better tolerated. Many elderly women are not willing to accept uterine
bleeding or breast tenderness, and these side effects may be reduced with lower
doses of estrogen.
For
women who cannot or will not use HRT, there are several other options for preventing
and treating osteoporosis. The bisphosphonate alendronate has been shown to increase
BMD and reduce the risk of fractures at the spine and hip. [26]
Side effects are generally minimal, but the patient needs to be willing to adhere
to a strict dosing regimen that requires taking the medication on arising in the
morning on an empty stomach with a full glass of water. She must not eat or drink
anything else for one-half hour and not recline or lie back down. Because the
one serious side effect with this medication is esophageal irritation or ulceration,
patients who already have significant gastroesophageal reflux disease may not
be good candidates for this treatment option. Other bisphosphonates are available
outside the United States, and additional agents are being developed. A second
bisphosphonate, risechonate, was approved by the FDA in April 2000.
Calcitonin
presents a third option for the treatment of osteoporosis. This medication has
shown BMD improvement and vertebral fraction reduction. [28]
It is recommended for women who will not be using HRT and who are at least 5 years
beyond menopause. The nasal spray
formulation is easy to use.
The
newest drugs approved by the FDA for the prevention of osteoporosis are SERMs.
These agents have the unique feature of functioning as estrogen agonists at some
sites in the body and estrogen antagonists at other sites. SERMs already on the
market for other purposes include tamoxifen and clomiphene citrate. Different
SERMs and estrogens bind with different affinities to the two identified estrogen
receptors.
The
one SERM approved for the prevention of osteoporosis is raloxifene. This drug
produces an increase in BMD and has a mildly beneficial effect on the lipid profile.
The reports on fracture prevention suggest a 30% to 50% reduction in vertebral
fractures. [11]
Unlike estrogen, raloxifene does not seem to stimulate the breast or the uterus.
One study indicated a 76% reduction in the incidence of invasive breast cancers
in raloxifene users when compared with a placebo group, [7]
making it an attractive alternative
for women concerned about breast cancer.
Raloxifene
will not alleviate hot flushes or vaginal dryness. This feature makes it a less
attractive option for newly menopausal women who are symptomatic. Side effects
associated with the drug include leg cramps and venous thromboembolic events.
The latter are no more common with raloxifene than they are with estrogen, with
approximately a three to four fold increase over the background rate of venous
thromboembolic events. A personal history of a venous thromboembolic event is
a contraindication to the use of this drug.
No
matter what therapy is used for osteoporosis, adequate calcium and vitamin D are
essential. Standard recommendations are 1000 mg/day of elemental calcium for the
woman using estrogen and 1500 mg/day of elemental calcium for the woman not using
HRT. The recommended adequate intake for vitamin D is 400 IU/day. The Food and
Nutrition Board uses the term adequate intake for calcium and vitamin D
instead of recommended daily allowance because it is thought that there
are not enough data to use the stronger recommendation.
Studies
indicate that many people over 65 years old in the United States are vitamin D
deficient. [9]
[38]
Furthermore, it has been shown that postmenopausal women with a hip fracture are
more likely to have occult vitamin D deficiency than their peers without a hip
fracture. [24]
The skin does not process vitamin D efficiently in the older person. In addition,
the elderly may not spend as much time in the sun. For these reasons, it has been
recommended that persons aged more than 65 years take an oral supplement of 600
IU of vitamin D per day. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation has been shown
to have beneficial effects even without the use of other drugs, with two studies
reporting a decrease in fractures in an elderly population given vitamin D and
calcium supplements. [6]
[8]
All
of these treatments for osteoporosis have produced varying degrees of improvement
in bone density and a reduction in fracture rate. The reduction in fracture does
not always correlate with the amount of improvement in bone density.
Regardless
of whether a woman uses HRT or any of the other osteoporosis treatment options,
she needs to maintain a healthy lifestyle that includes adequate calcium, vitamin
D, and exercise. Exercise is essential for preserving muscle tone and balance,
both of which are thought to be important for preventing the falls that are responsible
for most fractures. The role of gonadal steroids in maintaining muscle mass in
postmenopausal women has not been well studied.
Cardiovascular Effects:
no benefits; see WHI study (section on this and on cognitive
function edited out from original article, since new studies have shown either
increased risk (heart attacks and strokes) or no benefits (cognitive function)
CONCLUSIONS
It
is likely that the treatment offered to postmenopausal women in the years ahead
will continue to evolve. Because there seems to be no increased risk of breast
cancer with use of estrogen replacement therapy for less than 5 years, various
drugs may be offered at different times in the life of an individual. An estrogen
may be offered in the perimenopausal years to alleviate symptoms, followed by
a SERM, a "statin" together with a bisphosphonate for women with hypercholesterolemia,
or a healthy lifestyle alone. Based on current knowledge, individualization is
clearly required.
References
1. Albertazzi
P, Pansini F, Bonaccorsi G, et al: The effect of dietary soy supplementation on
hot flushes. Obstet Gynecol 91:6-10, 1998
2.
Andersen JW, Johnstone BM, Cook-Newell ME:
Meta-analysis of the effects of soy protein intake on serum lipids. N Engl J Med
333:276-282, 1995
3. Archer
DF, Pickar JH, Bottiglioni F, et al: Bleeding patterns in postmenopausal women
taking continuous combined or sequential regimens of conjugated estrogens with
medroxyprogesterone acetate. Obstet Gynecol 83:686-692, 1994
4. Bachmann
GA, Leiblum SR: Sexuality in sexagenarian women. Maturitas 13:43-50, 1991
5. Benson
M, Rebar RW: The relationship of migraine headache and stroke to oral contraceptive
use. J Reprod Med 31:1082-1088, 1986
6.
Chapuy M, Arlot M, DuBoeuf F, et al: Vitamin
D and calcium to prevent hip fractures in elderly women. N Engl J Med 327:637-642,
1992
7. Cummings
S, Eckert S, Krueger KA, et al: The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer
in postmenopausal women. JAMA 281:2189-2197, 1999
8.
Dawson-Hughes B, Dallal GE, Krall EA, et
al: A controlled trial of the effect of calcium supplementation on bone density
in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 323:878-883, 1990
9. Dawson-Hughes
B, Harris SS, Krall EA, et al: Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation
on bone density in men and women 65 years of age or older. N Engl J Med 337:670-676,
1997
10. Eisenberg
DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al: Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: Results
of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 280:1569-1575, 1998
11. Ettinger
B, Black M, Mitlak BH, et al: Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal
women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene. JAMA 282:637-645, 1999
12. Ettinger
B, Genant HK, Steiger P, et al: Low-dosage micronized 17B-estradiol prevents bone
loss in postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:479-488, 1992
13. Ettinger
B, Grady D: Maximizing the benefit of estrogen therapy for prevention of osteoporosis.
Menopause 1:19-34, 1994
14. Ettinger
B, Selby J, Citron J, et al: Cyclic hormone replacement therapy using quarterly
progestin. Obstet Gynecol 83:693-700, 1994
15.
Evans DA, Funkenstein HH, Albert MA, et
al: Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in a community population of older persons:
Higher than previously reported. JAMA 262:2551-2556, 1989
16. Evans
SF, Davie MWH: Low and conventional dose transdermal oestradiol are equally effective
at preventing bone loss in spine and femur at all post-menopausal ages. Clin Endocrinol
44:79-84, 1996
17. Filley
CM: Alzheimer's disease in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:1-7, 1997
18. Froerer
C, Liu JH, Pesce A, et al: Relationship of serum and salivary androgen levels
to sexual well-being in postmenopausal women [abstract]. Presented at the North
American Menopause Society 10th
Annual Meeting, New York, New York, September 23-25, 1999
19. Genant
HK, Lucas J, Weiss M, et al: Low-dose esterified estrogen therapy. Arch Intern
Med 8:22, 1997
20. Glueck
C, Fallat R, Scheel D: Effects of estrogenic compounds on triglyceride kinetics.
Metabolism 24:537-545, 1975
21.
Hirata JD, Swiersz LM, Zell B, et al: Does
dong quai have estrogenic effects in postmenopausal women? A double-blind, placebo-controlled
trial. Fertil Steril 68:981-986, 1997
22.
Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, et al: Randomized
trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease
in postmenopausal women. JAMA 280:605-613, 1998
23.
Ingram D, Sanders K, Kolybaba M, et al:
Case-control study of phyto-oestrogens and breast cancer. Lancet 350:990-994,
1997
24. LeBoff
MS, Kohlmeier L, Hurwitz S, et al: Occult vitamin D deficiency in postmenopausal
US women with acute hip fracture. JAMA 281:1505-1511, 1999
25. Lee
HP, Gourley L, Duffy SW, et al: Dietary effects on breast-cancer risk in Singapore.
Lancet 337:1197-1200, 1991
26.
Liberman UA, Weiss SR, Broll J, et al: Effect
of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in
postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 333:1437-1443, 1995
27. Lindsay
R, Hart DM, Clark DM: The minimum effective dose of estrogen for prevention of
postmenopausal bone loss. Obstet Gynecol 63:759-763, 1984
28. Maricic
MJ, Silverman SL, Chesnut C, et al: Salmon-calcitonin nasal spray prevents vertebral
fractures in established osteoporosis: Further interim results of the "PROOF"
study [abstract 578]. Arthritis Rheum 41(suppl):S129, 1998
29. Murray
SC, Muse K: Effective treatment of severe menstrual migraine headaches with gonadotropin-releasing
hormone agonist and "add-back" therapy. Fertil Steril 67:391-393, 1997
30. Naessen
T, Berglund L, Ulmsten U: Bone loss in elderly women prevented by ultralow doses
of parenteral 17-B estradiol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:115-119, 1997
31. Notelovitz
M, Varner RE, Rebar RW, et al: Minimal endometrial proliferation over a two-year
period in postmenopausal women taking 0.3 mg of unopposed esterified estrogens.
Menopause 4:80-88, 1997
32. Ravnikar
V: Compliance with hormone therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:1332-1334, 1987
33. Recker
RR, Davies KM, Dowd RM, et al: The effect of low-dose continuous estrogen and
progesterone therapy with calcium and vitamin D on bone in elderly women. Ann
Intern Med 130:897-904, 1999
34.
Scheiber MD, Setchell KDR, Liu JH, et al:
Dietary soy supplementation reduces LDL oxidation and bone turnover in healthy
postmenopausal women. [abstract no. P3-324]. Presented at the Endocrine Society
81st Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, June 12-15, 1999
35.
Schneider DL, Barrett-Connor EL, Morton
DJ: Timing of postmenopausal estrogen for optimal bone mineral density. JAMA 277:543-547,
1997
36. Shaywitz
SE, Shaywitz BA, Pugh KR, et al: Effect of estrogen on brain activation patterns
in postmenopausal women during working memory tasks. JAMA 281:1197-1202, 1999
37. Sherwin
BB, Gelfand MM: The role of androgen in the maintenance of sexual functioning
in oophorectomized women. Psychosom Med 49:397-409, 1987
38. Smerdely
P, Thornley S, Sekel R, et al: Subclinical vitamin D deficiency is the major biochemical
risk factor associated with hip fracture in elderly men. J Bone Miner Res 11(suppl
1):S233, 1996
39. Trabal
JF, Lenihan JP Jr, Melchione TE, et al: Low-dose unopposed estrogens: Preliminary
findings on the frequency and duration of vaginal bleeding in postmenopausal women
receiving esterified estrogens over a two-year period. Menopause 4:130-138, 1997
40. Watts
NB, Notelovitz M, Timmons MC, et al: Comparison of oral estrogens and estrogens
plus androgen on bone mineral density, menopausal symptoms, and lipid-lipoprotein
profiles in surgical menopause.
Obstet Gyneacol 85:529-537, 1995
41.
The Writing Group for the PEPI Trial: Effects
of estrogen or estrogen/progestin regimens on heart disease risk factors in postmenopausal
women. JAMA 273:199-208, 1995